Salami-slicing
A case of publishing thirty-three papers from one study. From the Neuroskeptic:
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-db_4z1oTLEI/WqBoNtWU8tI/AAAAAAAAD0Q/gt2J2TNtEX05-xtwwCSwJ00_hSWqg_icgCLcBGAs/s320/wtf_is_this.png)
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-db_4z1oTLEI/WqBoNtWU8tI/AAAAAAAAD0Q/gt2J2TNtEX05-xtwwCSwJ00_hSWqg_icgCLcBGAs/s320/wtf_is_this.png)
“Salami slicing” refers to the practice of breaking scientific studies down into small chunks and publishing each part as a seperate paper.
Given that scientists are judged in large part by the number of peer-reviewed papers they produce, it’s easy to understand the temptation to engage in salami publication. It’s officialy discouraged, but it’s still very common to see researchers writing perhaps 3 or 4 papers based on a single project that could, realistically, have been one big paper.
But I’ve just come across a salami that’s been sliced up so thinly that it’s just absurd. The journal Archives of Iranian Medicine just published a set of 33 papers about one study. Here they are – this is a rather silly image, but it’s a silly situation.
Labels: medicine
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home