Sir Mike

P8090251
… The promise of closure fleeing what remains
Of this extravagant, fatal, blinking life.
— Maya C. Popa, Fireflies


We all felt the same thing when we heard the news: first the blow, unexpected and jolting, then the sorrow. Sir Mike’s passing was announced in our gadgets as a brief note interrupting the otherwise uneventful chats about birthdays and the upcoming annual convention this October. The message was clear and somber: Sir Mike, our dear mentor and big brother in medical oncology, has died. He was in his forties.


I confirmed the news with batch mates and friends, and they confirmed the news with me: is this true? His passing remains difficult to believe—and harder still to understand. He was perfectly fit, was in great spirits, had a good support community. Nobody that night had real answers, merely clues that would be confirmed by a poster asking for prayers and an announcement of a funeral mass. The background was white. The JPEG showed a photo of Sir Mike smiling. He had a mischievous grin. I remember that he had a funny sense of humor, laughing at and with us, more like a big brother than a stern consultant. But he could be dead serious when he dissected cases, and always earnest and kind when he shared his experience as an early-career medical oncologist. Beside his photo were the dates of his birth and death— bookends to a life well-lived.


Writing about Sir Mike in the past tense is painful because it feels . . . wrong. Gone too soon, leaving this mortal coil prematurely. Why do the good people leave us behind? We are all in shock and in grief.


The best we can do for our departed loves ones is to keep them alive in our memories by speaking and writing about them. It’s my great honor to have been taught and mentored by a great man whose legacy—his compassionate care for his patients, his kindness, humility, and faith—will last many lifetimes.

Old issues

P9190198
P9190199
P9190200

 

Happiness in bulk is what I call the printed New Yorker, Paris Review, and London Review of Books copies that arrived in the mail two days ago. These back issues date back to as early as February 2025; the most recent is the September 6, 2025 issue.  The delay has something to do with logistics. The efficiency of PhilPost isn't exactly outstanding, but it has never lost any New Yorker issue since I had started my subscription two years ago. The magazines arrive late, too late sometimes that I question whether they are forthcoming. But on days when I least expect them, the mailman would knock on the gate, Paul would bark his welcome, and whoever is at home would receive the package and deposit it somewhere in the living room. If it's my mother, she would say, "Ano na naman ini? Daw library na kita diri." I think all homes should be like libraries, with shelves upon shelves of books. Nanay thinks otherwise.

 

My subscriptions come with unlimited access to the online issues and archives of these magazines; so I don't feel like I'm shortchanged. Reading the expired issues take me back to the recent history of the world and remind me that nothing, not even longstanding regimes, last forever. 

 

I understand that it's hard to make the case for the existence of printed versions of these materials, except that these physical magazines should exist because they are meant to. I can't do anything else when I flip through the pages except to read or scan them. There is far less distraction. The ads are predictable, static, and actually beautiful. Words on actual paper demand attention. The sound of the pages as I flip them, the visible creases of folding or rolling, the industrial and scholarly smell of ink on paper give me pleasure. 

Reading updates

Untitled


Books on my bedside table (which is actually Manong's--I was given permission to occupy his bedroom while he's away): Thomas Pynchon's V, Joan Acocella's The Bloodied Nightgown and Other Essays, Gregorio C. Brillantes's The Collected Stories, JRR Tolkien's Letters. My Kindles (I have the Paperwhite and Oasis, which are such deliciously wonderful reading devices!) are also near me: technically, they carry with them an entire library! 

 

As you know I read voraciously and widely, and with no clear pattern or organization, and unless I write about them I tend to forget their states of reading completion. But books, in this way, are lovely: they do not feel left behind or emotionally injured; they simply welcome you back when you return. 

 

Tolkien writes to Camilla Unwin, his publisher's daughter, who asked him, "What is the purpose of life?" as part of a school project (letter 310 in the book). 

 

If you do not believe in a personal God the question: 'What is the purpose of life?' is unaskable and unanswerable. To whom or what would you address the question?

 

He continues: 

 

So it may be said that the chief purpose of life, for any one of us, is to increase according to our capacity our knowledge of God by all the means we have, and to be moved by it to praise and thanks. 

 

I also like the letters to his sons, such as this tender letter to Michael (letter 38a), which starts with, "My beloved boy" and ends with "Your own dear Father."

 

You can repay me, as much as I could possibly ask, by adhering to your faith, and keeping yourself pure and sober, and giving me your confidence. Every good father deserves the fraternal friendship of his sons when they grow up.  


And his reminders and honesty to Christopher Tolkien (no. 54):

 

Pray on your feet, in cars, in blank moments of boredom. Not only petitionary prayer. But remember me: I have a good many difficulties to face. 

 

I like passages where he writes about CS Lewis, his dear friend, as you'll read in his letter to Christopher (no. 57): 

 

I saw the two Lewis bros. yesterday & lunched with C.S.L: quite an outing for me. The indefatigable man read me part of a new story! But he is putting the screw on me to finish mine. I needed some pressure, & shall probably respond; but the 'vac.' is already half over ...


I also like his brutal honesty about the endearing and frustrating irritations we have in our dearest of friends, as we read in his letter to Anne Barrett of Houghton Mifflin Co.: 

 

C.S.L. of course had some oddities and could sometimes be irritating.

 

And then there are passages where he writes more about his irritations: he hates being interviewed and photographed while at work, he disapproves of the the illustrations of his book (he calls himself a "pedant"), among other things. Consider his letter to Rayner Unwin (no. 277). The context of the letter was that in 1965, Ballantine Books produced a paperback version of The Hobbit in the US, without incorporating his revisions to the text, with a cover that he had disapproved of. The woman in the letter was a representative of the publishing house:

 

Why is such a woman let loose? I begin to feel that I am shut up in a madhouse. Perhaps with more experience you know of some way out of the lunatic labyrinth. 

Tears

P9070122


Some people are surprised when I tell them I have a class to catch, and could I see them on my next clinic day perhaps?

“Class”? You’re still in school? What are you studying? is the usual reply.

I say I’m a teacher, which doesn’t quite get the message across. Then I clarify that I’m a pro-fe-ssor, which elicits responses akin to admiration. “Professor Catedral” has a nice ring to it, like a smart, fancy, and profound human being. But nobody calls me that, unfortunately. In reality, though, much of academic life is answering emails, meeting with wayward students whose absences warrant me to be creative with their make-up tasks, and attending committee meetings that often start late and could have been just as productive as emails. But these in-person meetings are almost always moments of human connection, with the warmest and kindest of teachers, and with generous servings of crispy turon for snacks—so why not?

And I’m an assistant professor (some meetings), not a full professor (many meetings, I imagine).

The job of teaching does get easier with repeated practice. I like to think I’m a better teacher now than I was last year. Unless I find a valid reason to prepare them all over again, I rehash most of my lectures, repurposing and improving them to fit the moment for a specific batch of students in a specific point in history. My teaching-learning strategy is a hybrid of synchronous and asynchronous activities. On these last two weeks I shared my video recordings of lectures to my students. The topics are technical—better read than listened to. My students would doze off if I gave hour-long lectures in class. While they wash their dishes or prepare for sleep, they can listen to my spirited discussion about the hallmarks of cancer, the principles of cancer treatment, and the side effects of systemic oncologic treatment. They’re adult learners (I hope) and should have the internal motivation to learn things at their own pace. After some time, I meet them in person, expecting they’ve done their homework.

Last Thursday afternoon, I gave my last lecture for the oncology module of the (Internal) Medicine course this academic year. What I had originally outlined as a 40-minute summary lecture extended well into the afternoon, with my students asking me deeply profound and smart questions, both personal and technical, that they could all be topics of an essay collection.

For that afternoon, I intentionally shared stories about my patients to give the personal side to otherwise technical concepts.

I illustrated Weinberg and Hanahan’s Hallmarks of cancer through a story about my young patient with ALK-positive lung cancer. That allowed me to to talk about targeted treatments, crippling the process of oncogenesis, especially invasion and metastasis. This man had superior vena cava syndrome and was at the brink of respiratory failure because the lung mass was obstructing his airway. When he took alectinib his symptoms disappeared; he is now back at work.

When I spoke about honoring the patient’s wishes, I told them the story of one of my first patients in the city: a university professor, a single mother, who had stage IV rectal cancer. I shared to my students my mental picture of her: always well put-together, with her flowing dress and lipstick, and her remark: Hindi halata ang colostomy bag, Dok, no? She chose not to see me for a year; she felt great after all the treatments and decided it was the best course of action to resume her life. The cancer was quiet for all those months, but she came back, jaundiced, in pain. She told me: I’m ready to get treatments again. I want to live long enough to see my son graduate.

Her sister would return to the clinic and would tell me how the senior high school graduation went: the patient was inside the car, looking out the window, seeing her son get his diploma. She would die the day after, her prayers answered: she had set her son up for success. And all was well. 

I delivered the lecture in the fourth floor auditorium with tiered, theater-style seating, and I could see my students’ faces. Many were in tears..

I went on and on—getting through my slide set and remembering my patients, forcing myself to hear the sound of their voices and laughter—until I was done. Any questions? I asked. 

Several students raised their hands, but not all at once. They asked me things I still ask myself. How do I deal with so much pain and suffering? How do I react to patients who do not have the funds for their treatment? Do I ever get sad and frustrated?

There was some personal confessions, too. The students opened up their hearts, becoming vulnerable, understanding that ours was a safe, sacred space. A student told me I was her grandfather’s doctor and she thanked me. Her Lolo had passed away. One student said his mother died when he was 16 years old. I asked him, You must miss her, don’t you? She must be your reason for taking up medicine. She must be so proud of you.

I was asked: Do you cry?

I said, I schedule my moments of drama.

Lunch fellowships in church

On the first Sundays of the month, after communion service, my local church gathers together for fellowship lunch. Each family brings food to share. Visitors are welcome to join. If you leave, people will insist, smiling and pleading, that you stay and have a small bite, at least. This has been going around since my earliest memory of being in church and is one of the highlights of the church's monthly calendar. 

After getting food, you find a table and chair, small and colorful, borrowed from the nearby pre-school classrooms. (Our church has a school ministry.) You have a chat with others. If you hardly know anyone, someone else will approach and welcome you. A familial warmth circulates in the atmosphere. The formal communion in the worship service overflows in the informal lunch tables. Everyone feels at home such that nobody hesitates to eat with their hands, should the food require it.

That seems like a nightmare for introverts, but there's a table for the quiet and shy. They usually recognize each other and gather together. The fellowship lunch for them may feel just as welcoming. We have people in church who are naturally predisposed to quiet; the people at church would simply come over and ask, "Hi, are you good? We have more food." Our church excels in hospitality and generosity. 

The local church is amazing to me. In my life, God has brought me to places where there are churches that preach the Gospel and that happen to serve amazing food. Food equals warm welcome in Filipino Christian culture. 

On this Monday morning, as I prepare for work, I remember the lunch fellowship we just had: a feast for the body and soul. 

I love what Alistair Begg wrote:

The world is full of people struggling to find where they fit or striving to maintain their position in a company, society, friendship circle, or even their own family. God does not ask you to struggle or to strive but simply to enjoy. If you belong to God's people by faith in Jesus, then you have been rescued by His name, you have been freed from share, and you are part of His people. It is here that you fit, here that you find your home.

So yes: the church feels homey because it is home. 


P8240068

P8240051

P8240060

P8240089

P7270126

How to resize embedded photos from Flickr

Tokyo 2025
Some website housekeeping, in case I forget. 

If you were here this week, you must have noticed that the photos have not been loading properly. I figured, with some AI help, that it could be due to this CSS/xml script I added to automatically resize the image widths of my embedded Flickr photos. 

/*----- POST IMAGE -----*/
    .post-body .separator {}
    .post-body .separator img {
      max-width: 100%;
      height: auto;
      margin-bottom: 15px;
    }
.post-body img,
.post-body .separator a img,
.post-body iframe,
.post-body video,
.post-body embed {
  width: 100% !important;   /* always match the column’s width */
  max-width: 100% !important;
  height: auto !important;  /* keep the correct proportions */
  display: block;           /* eliminates stray inline gaps */
}
/* === EXCEPTION: keep Flickr photos at their native width ============== */
/* Full-width for regular images and the usual video hosts */
.post-body img,
.post-body .separator a img,
.post-body iframe[src*="youtube.com"],
.post-body iframe[src*="youtu.be"],
.post-body iframe[src*="vimeo.com"],
.post-body video,
.post-body embed {
  width: 100% !important;
  max-width: 100% !important;
  height: auto !important;
  display: block;
}
/* Let Flickr’s own script control sizing */
.post-body iframe[src*="flickr.com"],
.post-body a[data-flickr-embed="true"] {
  width: auto !important;      /* keep native width */
  max-width: 100% !important;  /* still responsive if wider than column */
  height: auto !important;
  display: block;
  margin: 0 auto 15px;         /* centre + bottom gap */
}
  .tr-caption-container {
      margin-top: 10px;
      margin-bottom: 15px;
    }
    .tr-caption-container td {
      width: 300px;
    }
    .tr-caption-container td img {
      max-width: 100%;
      height: auto;
    }
    .tr-caption-container .tr-caption {
      color: #555;
      font-size: .9rem;
      font-style: italic;
      background-color: #eee;
      padding: 5px 0;
      border: none;
    }


I did some tweaks—the closest I've been to vibe-coding—but AI couldn't seem to grasp the situation. With some common sense, I realize the issue could be the caption container. I never put captions in photos; I describe the pictures in the text. I deleted that part of the code and retained the following.


/*----- POST IMAGE -----*/
.post-body .separator {}
.post-body .separator img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
margin-bottom: 15px;
}

/* === EXCEPTION: keep Flickr photos at their native width ============== */
/* Full-width for regular images and the usual video hosts */
.post-body img,
.post-body .separator a img,
.post-body iframe[src*="youtube.com"],
.post-body iframe[src*="youtu.be"],
.post-body iframe[src*="vimeo.com"],
.post-body video,
.post-body embed {
width: 100% !important;
max-width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
display: block;
}

Problem fixed—but I don't claim credit entirely.